PPWR Article 29 is the provision that will most fundamentally challenge how DTC e-commerce brands think about packaging. It requires that 10% of e-commerce delivery packaging be reusable by 1 January 2030, rising to 50% by 1 January 2040.
This is not a target for industry associations or national governments. It is an obligation that applies directly to producers who use packaging for e-commerce deliveries.
PPWR Article 29(1)(d) specifically covers "packaging used for e-commerce purposes" as one of the packaging categories subject to mandatory re-use targets. Article 29(3) sets:
The 10% target is calculated as: (number of sales units offered in reusable packaging) ÷ (total number of sales units shipped) × 100.
"Sales units offered in reusable packaging" means units that the consumer can receive in reusable packaging through a take-back or return scheme. It is not sufficient to use a packaging material that is capable of being reused — there must be a functioning system for the packaging to be returned and reused.
PPWR Article 3(46) defines reusable packaging as: packaging that has been conceived, designed, and placed on the market to accomplish multiple trips or rotations during its lifecycle, by being refilled or reused for the same purpose for which it was conceived.
For counting toward the 10% target, reusable packaging must additionally:
What clearly counts:
What does not count:
PPWR Article 29(5) gives member states some flexibility in how they implement the re-use targets. National implementing measures may specify:
This means the specific compliance mechanics (how you prove you meet the 10%) will depend partly on national implementation by August 2026 or later. Watch for national implementing measures in Germany, France, and other key markets.
Providers like RePack (Finland/EU), Lizee (France), and similar operators run pooled reusable packaging systems. You pay per use; they handle return logistics, cleaning, and redeployment.
How it works:
Return rates in practice: Pooled systems report 70–90% return rates in markets with good infrastructure (Nordics, Netherlands, Germany urban). Return rates are lower in markets without established collection points.
Cost: Pool fees typically €2–€5 per trip for a standard mailer; higher for boxes. This is 3–10x the cost of a single-use poly mailer, but the cost per use decreases as packaging is reused 20–100 times.
Counting toward target: Each order shipped in pool packaging counts as 1 reusable unit toward the 10% target, regardless of whether that specific packaging is returned. The system's documented return rate demonstrates that packaging is being reused in the pool.
Larger brands develop their own reusable packaging with branded return envelopes or boxes and their own return incentive.
How it works:
Requirements: Needs operational infrastructure for return handling (receiving returns, inspection, storage, re-deployment). Works for brands with returns operations already in place (fashion, some DTC premium brands).
Advantage: Brand control, marketing opportunity (packaging is physically in consumer's home for weeks before return). Disadvantage: operationally complex at scale.
Rather than reusing shipping packaging, some product categories support refillable primary containers.
How it works:
Applicable categories: Concentrated cleaning products, beauty serums, some food products (dry goods, spices), personal care.
For PPWR counting purposes: This model may count if the refillable container system is structured correctly. The Commission's implementing methodology will clarify — the key question is whether refill systems qualify as the "packaging used for e-commerce purposes" being made reusable.
Rather than attempting 10% across all orders, some brands segment their offering:
If 10% of orders are above a threshold that qualifies for the premium/subscription tier, the 10% target may be met through that segment alone.
Risk: This approach needs the 10% calculation to be verified correctly. If regulators require 10% across all orders, not just a selected segment, selective re-use only works if the qualifying segment genuinely represents 10% or more of total units shipped.
The fundamental challenge with all return-based re-use systems is consumer behaviour. Return rates depend on:
Convenience of return: If returning requires a trip to a post office or specific drop-off point, return rates drop sharply. Markets with home pickup or dense carrier drop-off networks (Germany, Netherlands, France urban areas) perform better.
Incentive: Financial incentives (deposit systems where consumer pays a deposit and receives it back on return) achieve the highest return rates. No-incentive systems rely on consumer environmental motivation, which varies widely.
Product category fit: High-value products or products consumers are likely to want to reorder (subscription items, refillables) have higher return propensity than impulse purchases.
Packaging appeal: Reusable packaging that consumers perceive as valuable or attractive achieves higher return rates. Functional but ugly packaging gets discarded.
For most DTC brands, starting with a reputable third-party pool system is lower risk than building a proprietary return system. The pool operator has already optimised for return rates; you leverage their infrastructure.
Re-use adds cost in the short term. The 10% target means the cost burden is limited until 2030, rising significantly with the 50% target for 2040.
2030 scenario (10% reusable):
This is manageable. The 2040 scenario (50% reusable) is where cost becomes more significant, and where re-use system economics need to be fundamentally better than they are today. The Commission's expectation is that scaled re-use infrastructure will reduce costs significantly by 2035–2040.
PPWR Article 29(7) requires producers to report annually on:
This reporting is expected to flow through national EPR systems. The mechanism will be specified in national implementing measures. Brands should expect to add re-use metrics to their annual EPR reporting from 2030.
Brands that pilot re-use packaging before 2030 benefit from:
---
For the recycled content parallel to re-use targets, see Mandatory recycled content targets: what brands must achieve by 2030. For overall EPR cost modelling including re-use, see EPR cost modelling across 7 EU markets.