EPR fee comparison: Germany vs France vs Netherlands 2026 rates

If you're selling to customers in Germany, France, and the Netherlands, you have three separate EPR bills to pay — with different rates, different material categories, and different PROs. Here's a direct comparison to help you understand where your fee exposure is highest and plan your compliance budget.

The 2026 rate landscape at a glance

Rates below are indicative for 2026. Official rates are published annually by each PRO and can vary within ranges based on eco-modulation adjustments.

Paper and cardboard

| Material | Germany | France (Citeo) | Netherlands (Verpact) |

|----------|---------|----------------|----------------------|

| Corrugated cardboard (uncoated) | €60–€85/t | €105–€140/t | €75–€110/t |

| Coated/laminated cardboard | €80–€100/t | €120–€165/t | €85–€120/t |

| Kraft paper | €55–€80/t | €100–€135/t | €70–€100/t |

France charges the highest rates for paper and cardboard of these three markets. If you're shipping a lot of cardboard boxes to French customers, this is your largest absolute cost in France.

Plastics

| Material | Germany | France (Citeo) | Netherlands (Verpact) |

|----------|---------|----------------|----------------------|

| PET bottles (clear) | €100–€150/t | €170–€230/t | €130–€180/t |

| HDPE rigid (natural/clear) | €110–€160/t | €180–€250/t | €140–€200/t |

| PP rigid containers | €130–€190/t | €220–€300/t | €160–€220/t |

| LDPE / PE film (polybags, wrap) | €180–€260/t | €300–€400/t | €200–€280/t |

| EPS (foam) | €200–€300/t | €350–€500/t+ | €240–€320/t |

| Multi-layer flexible film | €200–€280/t | €320–€450/t | €220–€290/t |

Key observations:

Glass

| Material | Germany | France (Citeo) | Netherlands (Verpact) |

|----------|---------|----------------|----------------------|

| Clear glass | €8–€18/t | €12–€22/t | €8–€15/t |

| Coloured glass | €10–€22/t | €15–€28/t | €10–€18/t |

Glass rates are similar across markets and low in absolute terms. Glass brands (wine, spirits, beauty) will find the Netherlands has the cheapest glass rates of the three.

Metals

| Material | Germany | France (Citeo) | Netherlands (Verpact) |

|----------|---------|----------------|----------------------|

| Steel (tins, cans) | €30–€55/t | €55–€80/t | €40–€65/t |

| Aluminium | €55–€90/t | €85–€120/t | €65–€95/t |

Again, France is the most expensive, though metal packaging is rarely a dominant cost driver for DTC brands.

Threshold differences matter for Netherlands

A crucial difference: the Netherlands has a 50,000 kg collective participation threshold. Below that, you register and file a declaration but pay no participation fees to Verpact.

For most DTC brands, the Netherlands has zero EPR fees until you reach 50,000 kg/year of packaging — roughly equivalent to shipping ~165,000+ orders with 300g average packaging per order. Most Shopify brands are well below this.

Germany has a 50 kg threshold — reached within a few hundred shipments. France has no threshold. So for small brands entering three markets simultaneously, Germany and France generate immediate EPR fee liability; Netherlands does not.

A full brand worked example

Brand: A premium skincare brand launching in DE, FR, NL

Packaging per order:

Annual orders to each market: 8,000 DE / 5,000 FR / 3,000 NL

Step 1: Annual kg by material by country

| Material | DE (8,000 orders) | FR (5,000 orders) | NL (3,000 orders) |

|----------|------------------|--------------------|-------------------|

| Glass | 640 kg | 400 kg | 240 kg |

| Cardboard | 2,000 kg | 1,250 kg | 750 kg |

| Paper | 400 kg | 250 kg | 150 kg |

Step 2: Apply midpoint rates

Germany:

France:

Netherlands (3,000 orders × 300g = 900 kg total — well below 50,000 kg threshold):

Total EPR bill for this brand: ~€372/year

This is below most people's expectations. EPR fees are genuinely not a major cost for most DTC brands at typical volumes.

When EPR costs become meaningful

EPR costs become material at scale:

At 50,000 orders/year to Germany (with 300g/order = 15,000 kg cardboard equivalent):

At 100,000 orders/year across DE/FR:

Brands using heavy plastic packaging (poly mailers, pouches) see higher costs earlier because plastic rates are 2–3x cardboard rates.

The real threshold where EPR becomes a board-level line item is typically €50M+ annual EU e-commerce revenue. Below that, it's a compliance item, not a margin driver.

Fee trend: direction of travel

All EU EPR rates are increasing. The PPWR drives this through several mechanisms:

  1. Eco-modulation surcharges for non-recyclable packaging (coming 2030) will add 50–100% to fees for problematic packaging formats
  2. PROs must fund expanding collection and recycling infrastructure — costs that pass through to fee rates
  3. National targets for packaging waste reduction mean PROs need more funding to run awareness campaigns and infrastructure

Rates increased 10–25% on average across these three markets from 2023 to 2026. Expect similar increases through 2030.

Practical implications for your EPR budget

Budget for growth: EPR fees scale with volume. If you're projecting 3x EU revenue growth, budget 3x EPR fees.

Model eco-modulation: If you're using LDPE polybags for any market, get a quote from Citeo or a French PRO — your France fees will be higher than this comparison suggests.

Netherlands threshold awareness: If you're approaching 50,000 kg in Netherlands, get ready for fees that appear suddenly. Model the breakeven point.

PRO shopping in Germany: Germany has multiple competing PROs with genuinely different rates. Get three quotes before committing. Rate differences of 10–20% are common.

---

For the full 7-market picture, see our expert article on EPR cost modelling across 7 EU markets.